A History of Boston Ultimate ---------------------------- I've come to believe that the way things have happened in Boston Ultimate is a natural chain of events that is almost inescapable. In olden days, before I can remember, there was the Hostages and the Rude Boys, although they may or may not have overlapped. The Rudies definitely lasted longer, though, and they became Titanic. I think the change was similar to the Big Brother of 1993/DOG of '94 change. Titanic ruled Boston for a number of years, and there was usually one or two decent B teams here, teams who could give Titanic a game on a good day, maybe beat them every other year, who would be a strong contender for #3 in the Northeast. These teams included Mr. Bubble, the Boneheads, the Mary Jane Girls, Z, the early version of Earth Atomizer, and probably several others. In 1989, I moved to town, Z was absorbed by Earth Atomizer (about 5 Z guys joined Earth and the rest found other teams), and Earth made Nationals for the first time, going 1-4. Father Throws Best would usually beat Earth then, as would many other teams, and before Regionals there was no clear cut B team here. In 1990, Titanic had a youth movement and became First Time Gary, Earth continued to improve, and no other team did very well. Earth beat out FTG for second place in Fall Regionals and went 3-2 at Nationals while Titanic lost in the semis. In 1991, Earth and Big Brother finished 1-2 in their pool at Worlds (Earth beat BB 14-11 in a must-win game) to advance to the semis. At the time, NY would beat BB almost all the time in a close game, NY would beat Earth all the time by about 17-10 (although Worlds' semis was 21-7), and BB would lose to Earth almost half the time but to no one else. That fall, Earth tried to institute lots of changes so we could beat NY, had a couple key injuries, and didn't even make Nationals. That winter, Big Brother absorbed 8 players from Earth (3 key players, 5 good but not stars) in order to defeat the Evil Empire. Earth became King Tut or Area B or something and fell to 4th or 5th in NE. Big Brother stepped up a half-notch, now beating NY about half the time but not in Cuervo or Nationals, even winning the Region two years in a row. In 1992, we would have had to play a good game the whole way to win (we played well up to 10-8 us), but 1993 we just had to avoid playing a bad game to win (we played ok up to 4-4, then self-destructed). This spring, we decided to return to the Earth Atomizer over-achieving style of play, lots of dumps and poaches, efficient use of resources, no brain-dead playing allowed, and have had tremendous results, and now we're in charge. In a couple years, the whole cycle will start again. As for the second team in Boston, I think it's impossible to "somehow get everybody together and divide up into two teams in a reasonable way", given how things work around here. And here is Paul Dixon's opinion. Paul was captain of Earth Atomizer during its heyday (1989-1991) and a former (college) Nationals Champion with Zoo Disc (UMass) in 1986 ish. What's happened to Boston Ultimate? The same thing could probably be said about NY Ultimate as their 2,3,4 teams have gotten progressively weaker. I think back to Fall 88 when Earth Atomizer finished fifth in Sectionals behind Titanic, Father Throws Best, Z, and Bete Noire. I think all of these teams would beat the present #2 team. Or do I say that because at the time my view of competitive Ultimate was different in that Earth was still the best team I had played on to date. All of the above teams had a distinct personality. It wasn't like people cut from one team would just move down the line to the next although we did cut Jordan and Huggett (stupid Troy and Jamie). FTB was the ex Rude Boys and Titanic players that didn't want to practice anymore. A good analogy would be last year's Masters team. Bete noire was just Mighty Tired without the drinking. Earth was the stoners and Z was Chris Phillips getting pissed off at Mooney and forming a splinter team. Kind of like as if Lenny or whoever split off from DoG. All these people (or the same types) are still around. I think what might hurt is the third spot at Nationals. Before then teams knew they weren't going to make Nationals so they played more for fun or with their friends. Also there was a big influx of college grads from 84-89. Northeast college ultimate was very strong during that period. It's been very weak since. The bad economy in the early 90's didn't help. It's also very difficult for players to drop a level. In the period from 85-92 probably 60 or 70 players played for some Boston team at Nationals. After reaching that level the swill tolerance drops rapidly so good players don't want to waste their time playing for a team that doesn't have a legitimate shot. More people than ever are playing this sport but they don't seem to be trickling up to the club level. Maybe the growth of summer league and particularly corporate league have enabled people to get their Ultimate fix without travelling so much. It used to be if you wanted to play you had to play on a club team. Anyway thats my 2c dix -------- And here is Steve Mooney's view: Winning Ultimate came to Boston in 1979 & 1980, with an influx of Cornell and Hampshire graduates who formed Boston Aerodisc. In 1980, Aerodisc lost to The Boro (Timba's team) in a timed game that came down to a dropped disc in the end zone that would have tied the score. Essentially, that loss propelled future successes as a new team, the Rude Boys, was formed out of the Aerodisc wreckage in the summer of 1981. For years to come, the Rude Boys (Mooney/Adams) and Hostages (Barkan/Gufstasen) battled for supremacy in Boston with the knowledge that the winner could/would win at Nationals. As far as I'm concerned, these were the glory years where teams played in twelve tournaments between September and November, all of them hotly contested (ZooDisc, Cornell, Heifers, Knights of Nee all were very competitive). The Rude Boys' devastating loss to the Hostages in the finals of 1981 Regionals (only one team advanced from each Region), a classic Hostage zone versus Rude Boy man, surprised all but the Stooges. Pathetic and satiated from this victory, the Hostages took a skeleton team to Nationals and sputtered, opening the door to a Condor Championship. Fueled by that Regional loss, the Rude Boys worked harder (6 am practices) the following year bringing home the coveted title, beating the Hostages in the semis and defeating all opponents by the largest margin on record (no team closer than seven goals). Traveling to Goteburg Sweden for the first ever Worlds was the crowning glory (Rudies played in a demo game at half-time of a soccer game: 15,000 fans in attendance). That year, the Rude Boys played nothing but 'straight-up' man (not a single point of zone) with virtually no offensive strategy. A few guys could throw an overhead; the inside out didn't even exist. In 1983, following a successful world banquet circuit, the Rude Boys attended Nationals fat and cocky, losing twice (San Diego, Windy City). 1984 would be the death knell for the Rude Boys as they again failed to show past resilience (that one crown seemed to be enough). It was at this time that Titanic was formed (Phillips/Mooney/Seeger) out of a spectacular pool of talent in Boston. That team, much like the Double Happiness team of 94, was unstoppable... on paper. Ranked first entering Nationals, we lost early and often (never gelled). This Titanic team did, finally, advance to the championship game at Nationals in 88, defeating arch nemesis Windy City in the semis, only to run out of gas against South Bay (missed opportunity). Big Brother (Seeger/Mooney) grew out of the frustration of this loss (note the pattern: winning keeps teams together, losing results in change). Meanwhile another Boston team found satisfaction in playing Big Brother close in meaningless games (many taking place at Wellesley High School). Titanic, Big Brother and First Time Gary had begun an impressive string of Boston semi-final or better finishes at Nationals that still reigns: could be close to ten years running. Death or Glory resulted from the three or four consecutive losses in those semis and finals to NY (pattern). Thank the heavens (and ME) for NY's desire to 'shake things up' in 1994 setting up the easiest road to victory for any team since the Tuna's in '84 or '85. The parallels between the Houston Rockets winning after Michael Jordan's retirement (weaker field of teams?) and DoG's victory after NY's demise are unmistakable. Don't you think? ----- Any one else?