| From: lawler@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
(lawler@binah.cc.brandeis.edu) Subject: Spirit discussions Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc Date: 1993-11-22 08:37:27 PST |
People are discussing spirit of the game, and accusing teams of "spirit of the game violations" as if spirit of the game is something that is really well defined. Consider the following Ultimate games - 1. Pick Up game in the park 2. Mid level college teams scrimmaging 3. College teams playing in a tournament 4. Mid level club teams playing 5. Top level club teams playin in Regional Finals 6. Top level club teams playing in National Finals In my experience, "spirit of the game" means something very different at each of these levels, and if you have played only at a certain level, it seems that the levels above you are very unspirited. When I first began playing Ultimate in the park in Omaha, the "rules" were that you called your own fouls -- rarely did somebody call a foul on another player and I don't think I ever saw a foul contested. Last year on this newsgroup, there was a discussion informing me that calling your own fouls was anti-SOTG. Hmmmm. It is hard to say what spirit means at the top level. Most people on this newsgroup seem to think that according to their definition of spirit, spirit does not exist at the top level. I think that spirit does exist, it is just different. If nothing else, spirit at that level means that things stay on the field. Once the NY/Boston game was over, it was over. Yes, it got out of hand a few times, but the players shook hands (even Kenny and Jeremy, Mooney and Johnny G., Joey and Cribber) and game over. When you put as much time and effort into Ultimamte as the top teams do, in the Semi's of nationals, there is going to be a lot of emotion. What surprises me is not that things got out of hand, but that it hadn't really ever happened before. Yes, we need observers at this level with power to make more than active line calls. Banning players or teams from the UPA or refusing to play teams seems like a bad idea, people with the power to control players and fights at Nationals is a better idea. On a slightly different note - New York is getting a lot of bad press on this newsgroup. Even a bad game at nationals between NY and Boston where it was said that BOTH teams were equally at fault, has turned into another NY bashing thread. I've heard a lot of the NY players complaining about all of the bad press they get, and how no other teams are treated like that. At first I thought they were just complaining, but over the last year, I've paid attention to what is said about NY and other teams, and it really seems to be true. As a consequence of the bad press, crowds tend to root against NY (e.g. Worlds, Nationals), so can you really blame NY for thinking it is us against them - where "them" is the rest of the ultimate community. I played NY and Boston several times as a member of the Boston Kremes. They were both spirited teams. I think you will find that if you play one of the better teams in the country, more often than not, they will be very spirited. They NY players have done a lot for Ultimate in the NY area, the NE, the US, and the World. They coach high school teams, college teams, and even help out other club teams in the area. I know that several of them were flown to Japan to help kick-start the ultimate program there. Talk of kicking them out of the UPA is non-sensical. Perhaps, if the rest of the UPA changes their attitude towards the NY team, we would see a big change in what is perceived as their lack of spirit of the game. On that note, before the Open finals at nationals, one of the Double players said that they were going to be very spirited towards NY - say "nice goal" before NY could spike the disc, shake hands on a nice play, not spike on the NY plays, etc.. It think that it was said by someone on the net, that the finals was a pretty spirited game. Tross Big Brother